And now another one about Twitter, sort of. As with the cycling post, I’m not positively nuts about Twitter (and God knows there’s already enough aggrandising analysis about it out there already), but it’s undeniably magnetic. On a completely different track, I was looking for a reference in a post I wrote almost exactly a year ago about what I thought a multiplayer videogame might be like in the future, and came across this passage:
There will certainly be more cross-pollination between the game and the web, and between your activities in-game and your activities on the web. Just like your real life bleeds into your online life via your blog and your Flickr account, that reflected online persona will in turn become drawn into your gaming persona. Gaming will probably become a pretty poor label for what eventually emerges (as it becomes less about play and more about interaction and creation), but the name will stick, just like “talkies” never really caught on over “movies” in the cinema. Virtual space will feel more like an actual space (it might even be actual space), more like something you inhabit than somewhere you pass through. You’ll leave traces of where you’ve been behind you, and you’ll return after a break to see the traces of others that were there in the interim, and this sense of effect and permanence will infuse the entire game and encourage continued interaction, just as the gradual accumulation of an archive of blog posts rewards the ongoing effort of writing.
It doesn’t quite have the property of capturing passive activities or play that I was pushing for, but it’s not a stretch to read that and draw some parallels with the model of interaction that makes Twitter attractive. I wrote that a just year ago, last July, and already the fact that Flickr was the only service that was available to reference seems slightly clunky and antiquated.
This post tries to figure out how you could explain a news item about World of Warcraft being spammed to someone from thirty years ago, and the scale of the backstory necessary is just fantastically funny. I had a conversation the other day about long term predictions. I argued that a certain science fiction-style technological breakthrough wouldn’t happen in my lifetime, but now I’m not quite so sure. Not because of something as trivial as Twitter, of course, but just because even though I thought I knew something a few months ago, you just don’t see this stuff coming.
The frequency with which I write about cycling here probably belies my actual interest in the activity. Although I enjoy going out for a spin from time to time, cycling is mostly a utilitarian undertaking for me. But it’s also 30 minutes of guaranteed, uninterrupted empty time every day, and for someone who is easily distracted, that’s probably a good thing. So, it’s fairly inevitable that I often find myself cycling along, mulling things over, being struck by some relatively mundane idea about the act, and typing it up when I get home. I get my shower ideas on the bike.
All of which is a way of saying “here comes more stuff about cycling”.
This time it’s city bike sharing. Via s+c (and in a probably unintentional allusion to 1968), news that Paris’ “paving stones are being ripped” to accommodate hundreds of bike rental stations. You’ve heard of these; bays of bikes available for rent for a couple of hours at a time situated around the city. You grab a bike from one bay and dock it back at another within a reasonable amount of time, all for a couple of Euro. This presentation from the nascent New York project (PDF) outlines some of the existing European systems.
Of course, if you are in any way interested in interaction design (or if you’re Irish), you’re already picturing dozens of brand new bikes at the bottom of the nearest canal. How do you design a system that balances implicit trust and accessibility against overbearing security? Security cameras at every docking station? Mandatory pre-registration for every user? GPS tracking? And what about the payment method; prepay smartcards, supermarket-style coin locks, text message deductions? Credit card swiping is an option, but it renders the system useless to anyone who doesn’t carry plastic (I saw this on a system in Vienna, and it raised the barrier to adoption enough for me to not bother). These are not simple problems to solve, but the NY project linked above outlines the following prerequisites for success:
- The first half-hour must be free
- There must be sufficient density of bikes and stations
- A bike-share program must be independent and flexible
- Users must be able to render a bike immediately
All of this is to ignore the wider design problems of creating a bicycle-friendly city, and making people actually want to bike around. The topology of somewhere like Amsterdam (where I was lucky enough to enjoy an unforgettable day-long solo bike dérive) intrinsically suits cycling, but Dublin is almost as famous for being a traffic nightmare. Better bike lanes, perhaps more imminent thanks to the fact that two of our ministers bike to the Dáil every day, are probably the first step, but to be honest that’s a topic I’m not even ready to get into at this stage. Suffice to say that any viable solution will have to be as fair and advantageous for our car-driving friends as it might be for cyclists.
Not to be outdone, bike sharing is coming to Dublin too. This report from Dublin City Council (another PDF) outlines what seems to be a remarkably clued-in plan to introduce a 25 station, 500 bike scheme. No doubt some bright spark will think to slap some ads on them, too (the Paris operation is run by omnipresent billboard vendors JC Decaux). Ambulance chasers, this may be an unmissable opportunity to connect directly with your target audience.